Yea I know, camwhore. The resemblance is uncanny though. Probably because of the big eyes and her hair. Of course they're not identical. She'd need to enlarge her eyes to a third of her facial area, dramatically shrink her nose and remove her lips. And then put some clothes on.
Been annoyed by the latest WC3 patch lately and people who refuse to update their versions? Found this in the Garena forum. It's the Warcraft Version Changer (WVC) and all you need to do is download it, extract it and run it. Doesn't even require you to download the patches because they're all inside. Very convenient.
I feel it would be strange if adults would look at anything resembling to porn and feel awkward. What are they going to do when they have sex? Cover their eyes, just lie down and be as sexually arousing as a corpse? Unless you're attached to a necrophile, you'll have to get used to the fact that you're borned to make love, and making love is a two-way thing.
Whether you're male or female, you aren't supposed to react strangely if you encounter nudity. Talking about boobs isn't obscene, a picture of a piece of chocolate shaped like a penis isn't obscene, talking about porn isn't obscene. That's only for children, out of some sort of paranoia that children must not indulge in sexual acts.
Then comes the question of whether child sex can be justified at all.
Children should not have sex because sex is an important thing that can change lives, and children just aren't matured enough to make judgements on this issue.
First, sex is an important thing? Depends on where you are, I guess. Premarital sex began losing its taboo a long time ago, even in Asia. Unless you've been hiding in a cave all these time, you should have known about that too. What is wrong with premarital sex if both parties are willing? What reason can there be for refusing premarital sex other than the unthinking urge to reject such notions bred from young?
STDs? Then just stick with your gf/bf.
Unwanted pregnancies? Condoms, pills, etc.
Sex is no longer as dramatic an issue as it was a long time ago. Contraceptives are widely available. Abortions are always affordable. Unless you're unfortunate enough to get HIV from your boyfriend whom you've been having a steady relationship for years. If Death is coming for you, even a sincere vow of celibacy won't protect you from a speeding drunk.
Second, are children really not matured enough to make such decisions? If this is true, why are children having sex even at ages of 13 or 14? Why isn't anything done to prevent it adequately? Why would this be common enough that the numerous reports on Alfie discussed his age in relation to his fatherhood but not how this could happened at all?
That the shock was not how a child could be a father, but how incredibly young he was to be a father suggests that children (anyone below 16 or 18 or whatever) having sex with each other is not uncommon and the surprising thing to them was that he was a very very young boy.
When two children have sex, the question is no longer about morality, unless consensual sex is a moral problem. That children are trusted enough to have sex means that the adults are agreeing that children are matured enough to make decisions regarding sexual relationships.
Which, by the way, would make certain laws obsolete.
Are adults any better? At least a quarter of the adults I've ever encountered aren't as matured as they'd like to think they are. Yet they are trusted to make important decisions that will change their lives.
When two children have sex, is it really wrong?
From the practicality point of view, it is of no use. Adults are able to support a family, therefore they would be able to handle the side-effects of sexual intercourse, namely the babies.
Children, on the other hand, cannot make a living, unless they're working in sweatshops or as child prostitutes in Cambodia. Discounting these exceptions, children cannot handle the side-effects of unprotected sex.
Unprotected is the keyword here. With proper employment of contraceptive measures, sex can be a fun and healthy activity for the whole family.
Just kidding. But you should get what I mean. With condoms (not pills, pills may harm children though I'm not sure), children can get all the joys of sex with no strings attached, other than the cost of condoms.
F*ck, pardon my unorthodox sense of humour.
With contraceptives, sex is just an activity. As long as you don't foolishly invest your romantic love into your partner in a one-night-stand, sex is just sex.
Therefore, why can't children "experiment" with each other? I know people do that, but secretly. The thing is, must it be a secret?
If sex has become a harmless activity, would there be a reason to stop it?
I am sleepy and if my argument is invalid, whatever. It's incomplete anyway and I don't care anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment